Showing posts with label why. Show all posts
Showing posts with label why. Show all posts

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Really America? Really?

Just pondering a few questions, answers to which are possibly more important than we may realize:

  • Are a professional basketball player's bedroom choices really worth a couple days' headlines and a personal, congratulatory phone call from the President of these United States to commend him for his courage? Really? Frankly, I don't give a damn.
  • Why did the United States leave four citizens hanging in the wind in far away Libya, resulting in their deaths? Really, why?
  • Must I accept the redefining of Marriage? If so...what's next on the agenda?
  • What good are even more gun laws going to do in the prevention of murder? After all, check the trends from 1993 to 2011 as published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics here
  • How rampant is human trafficking in the United States? Is one particular group responsible for most of it? 
  • Is my Baby Boomer generation the last to experience "retirement" as it used to be known?
  • Did the Cleveland PD totally drop the ball on fully investigating strange reports from that house-turned-prison in their city? 
  • Where have all the Woodward- and Bernstein-like real investigative reporters gone? 
  • Why do we give more of our time and effort considering the latest Lindsay Lohan drunken episode or Kim Kardashian's marital mess than we do to matters that are actually important
    • (By the way, who was thrown off Dancing With The Stars last night???)
  • Have welfare programs doomed America's future? 
  • Is personal responsibility a thing of the past?
  • Has consideration of these questions ruined your mood for the day?

I'm normally quite a positive guy, but these questions and more have me a bit in the doldrums lately. 

Lord, help us. 


Saturday, April 21, 2012

R.I.P. Facts


I ran across this tongue-in-cheek article and decided to post it for your perusal. I think you, as I, will find it both humorous in ways and somewhat sad in others. Yes, it contains a political bent, but what doesn't these days?

Think about it. What is truth? What is an absolute fact any longer?

===================================================================

Facts, 360 B.C.-A.D. 2012
In memoriam: After years of health problems, Facts has finally died.

April 19, 2012 | By Rex W. Huppke, Chicago Tribune reporter

A quick review of the long and illustrious career of Facts reveals some of the world's most cherished absolutes: Gravity makes things fall down; 2 + 2 = 4; the sky is blue.

But for many, Facts' most memorable moments came in simple day-to-day realities, from a child's certainty of its mother's love to the comforting knowledge that a favorite television show would start promptly at 8 p.m.

Over the centuries, Facts became such a prevalent part of most people's lives that Irish philosopher Edmund Burke once said: "Facts are to the mind what food is to the body."

To the shock of most sentient beings, Facts died Wednesday, April 18, after a long battle for relevancy with the 24-hour news cycle, blogs and the Internet. Though few expected Facts to pull out of its years-long downward spiral, the official cause of death was from injuries suffered last week when Florida Republican Rep. Allen West steadfastly declared that as many as 81 of his fellow members of the U.S. House of Representatives are communists.

Facts held on for several days after that assault — brought on without a scrap of evidence or reason — before expiring peacefully at its home in a high school physics book. Facts was 2,372.

"It's very depressing," said Mary Poovey, a professor of English at New York University and author of "A History of the Modern Fact." "I think the thing Americans ought to miss most about facts is the lack of agreement that there are facts. This means we will never reach consensus about anything. Tax policies, presidential candidates. We'll never agree on anything."

Facts was born in ancient Greece, the brainchild of famed philosopher Aristotle. Poovey said that in its youth, Facts was viewed as "universal principles that everybody agrees on" or "shared assumptions."

But in the late 16th century, English philosopher and scientist Sir Francis Bacon took Facts under his wing and began to develop a new way of thinking.

"There was a shift of the word 'fact' to refer to empirical observations," Poovey said.
Facts became concrete observations based on evidence. It was growing up.
Through the 19th and 20th centuries, Facts reached adulthood as the world underwent a shift toward proving things true through the principles of physics and mathematical modeling. There was respect for scientists as arbiters of the truth, and Facts itself reached the peak of its power.

But those halcyon days would not last.

People unable to understand how science works began to question Facts. And at the same time there was a rise in political partisanship and a growth in the number of media outlets that would disseminate information, rarely relying on feedback from Facts.

"There was an erosion of any kind of collective sense of what's true or how you would go about verifying any truth claims," Poovey said. "Opinion has become the new truth. And many people who already have opinions see in the 'news' an affirmation of the opinion they already had, and that confirms their opinion as fact."

Though weakened, Facts managed to persevere through the last two decades, despite historic setbacks that included President Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky, the justification for PresidentGeorge W. Bush's decision to invade Iraq and the debate over President Barack Obama's American citizenship.

Facts was wounded repeatedly throughout the recent GOP primary campaign, near fatally when Michele Bachmann claimed a vaccine for a sexually transmitted disease causes mental retardation. In December, Facts was briefly hospitalized after MSNBC's erroneous report that GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney's campaign was using an expression once used by the Ku Klux Klan.

But friends and relatives of Facts said Rep. West's claim that dozens of Democratic politicians are communists was simply too much for the aging concept to overcome.

As the world mourned Wednesday, some were unwilling to believe Facts was actually gone.
Gary Alan Fine, the John Evans Professor of Sociology at Northwestern University, said: "Facts aren't dead. If anything, there are too many of them out there. There has been a population explosion."

Fine pointed to one of Facts' greatest battles, the debate over global warming.

"There are all kinds of studies out there," he said. "There is more than enough information to make any case you want to make. There may be a preponderance of evidence and there are communities that decide something is a fact, but there are enough facts that people who are opposed to that claim have their own facts to rely on."

To some, Fine's insistence on Facts' survival may seem reminiscent of the belief that rock stars like Jim Morrison are still alive.
"How do I know if Jim Morrison is dead?" Fine asked. "How do I know he's dead except that somebody told me that?"

Poovey, however, who knew Facts as well as anyone, said Facts' demise is undoubtedly factual.
"American society has lost confidence that there's a single alternative," she said. "Anybody can express an opinion on a blog or any other outlet and there's no system of verification or double-checking, you just say whatever you want to and it gets magnified. It's just kind of a bizarre world in which one person's opinion counts as much as anybody else's."

Facts is survived by two brothers, Rumor and Innuendo, and a sister, Emphatic Assertion.

Services are alleged to be private. In lieu of flowers, the family requests that mourners make a donation to their favorite super PAC.

rhuppke@tribune.com

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Why Do This?

I was just reading a blog post (appropriately) by Barry Ritholtz at his blog The Big Picturehttp://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/01/why-blog/ where he lists what he feels are the top 10 reasons a person would want to blog:

I can think of many reasons why someone might start and maintain a blog:
Blogs? Yeah We Got That
1. You have something to say
2. You enjoy the craft of writing
3. You want to figure out what you think, and do so in public
4. You want to be part of a larger community of like minded individuals
5. You have a hobby or interest that you are really, really into
6. You want to maintain a presence on the Intertubes
7. You have an expertise and you want to share it
8. You have an eye for content (text, graphics and video) and you enjoy leading other people to them
9. You want to create a permament online record of what you are reading, looking at or thinking about
10. You like engaging in debate with total strangers
That’s off the top of my head.

Number 9 hits my nail right on the head, with Honorable Mentions for #1 and #2. Imagine if you could read the thoughts and meanderings of your grandparents or great-grandparents. You could find out, in their own words, what made them tick, what they felt to be important, who and what was an important part of their lives. I believe that would be fantastic. I have some photos, some sketchy memories, and even a few birth, death, and military records from my own genealogical searches, but to "hear" what came directly from their heads and hearts would be absolutely fantastic, in my view. 

So, here you have it: my blog for the ages so that way down the road, when I become a sketchy memory, these posts will still exist in cyberspace for Emma, Jack, Mitch, Ben and even those that come after them. Call me goofy—many have for one reason or another—but I think that's a good enough reason...just in case they ever wonder.